WASHINGTON — Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., has proudly described herself as a “pro-life extremist.”
“My husband is a byproduct of rape,” she told a conservative student group in 2022, explaining her support for abortion bans with no exceptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. Nobody, she said, deserves “to be the judge, jury and executioner on whether or not he has a right to live or not.”
But the Florida Supreme Court’s ruling this week to allow a six-week abortion ban — and a second decision that would add a proposed constitutional amendment to the ballot in November overturning the ban — could pose political risks for a hard-liner such as Luna. Now, she and Rep. María Elvira Salazar, another Republican whose Florida district is not solidly red, will have to defend their records of supporting anti-abortion measures at the national level, with control of the House at stake.
The court’s ruling said the six-week abortion ban could go into effect May 1. But in a twist, it is also allowing a vote on a proposed constitutional amendment that would guarantee access to abortion “before viability,” around 24 weeks. The twin rulings have suddenly buoyed Democratic hopes of picking off House seats in a state that has long trended toward the right.
“Women and families across Florida are facing a backwards reality because their rights are being stripped away by far-right politicians,” said Lauryn Fanguen, a spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. “Anna Paulina Luna and María Elvira Salazar have embraced draconian laws that have forced government-mandated pregnancies — but in November, Floridians will have the opportunity to vote them and their extreme ideologies out of office and protect abortion rights.”
It’s not just Florida. The fate of reproductive rights is expected to be a major issue in House races across the country, especially for vulnerable Republicans who represent districts that President Joe Biden won in 2020. Some of those lawmakers have been struggling to appeal to conservative voters who favor severe restrictions without alienating a growing majority of voters who do not.
Rep. Michelle Steel, R-Calif., for instance, recently dropped her support for the Life at Conception Act, which amounts to a nationwide abortion ban, because she said it created “confusion” about her position on in vitro fertilization, which she said she supports.
Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., a previous co-sponsor of that bill who has also dropped his support, scrubbed his campaign website of the names of anti-abortion groups that have endorsed him, according to Rolling Stone. His “A” rating from anti-abortion organization SBA Pro-Life America, for instance, is no longer displayed there.
His campaign said that the removal was part of a regular website update and that 2024 endorsements from anti-abortion groups would be added as they were received.
Neither Luna nor Salazar has sponsored the legislation.
Abortion bans have become a politically toxic issue for Republicans in elections across the country. But in Florida, the court decisions this week have upped the ante, ensuring that the issue will play a defining role in the November elections.
Luna is a special case.
She said she was first convinced that life begins at conception in college, when she was dissecting a chicken embryo in a biology lab and watched it twitch away from her scalpel.
“Life does begin at conception, and even something like a chicken can sense danger from a scalpel,” she said on “Pro-Life Weekly,” a show on the Eternal Word Television Network, last year. (Luna said she was so horrified by what she witnessed that she promptly took 60 chicken eggs home with her, hatched them and gave them away to friends.)
Salazar, a veteran Miami-based news anchor who worked for Telemundo and CNN en Español before running for office, does not share as many vivid personal stories. But this year, she voted to restrict access to the abortion medication mifepristone. Salazar also voted to eliminate resources for active-duty service members seeking reproductive care, a measure Luna also supported. Those votes helped both women earn A+ ratings from SBA Pro-Life America.
Luna and Salazar both won their seats in 2022, after the Supreme Court had already overturned Roe v. Wade. But with Republicans in control of the House, they now have complicated voting records to defend, and the Florida court’s rulings will put those records front and center in their reelection races.
“It opens up some conversations with voters who normally wouldn’t be open to conversations,” said Steve Schale, a Democratic political operative who helped direct former President Barack Obama’s two general election victories in Florida and now runs a super political action committee backing Biden.
A spokesperson for Luna, Olivia Carson, said the Florida court rulings would have no effect on Luna’s race, because voters understood that abortion was a state issue. She dismissed the five Democrats vying for the chance to challenge Luna as unserious candidates.
But in a sign of how damaging the issue of reproductive rights has become for Republicans, Carson did not highlight the “anti-abortion extremist” record that Luna has been eager to advertise in the past — including her previously stated support for Florida’s six-week abortion ban that she said was “following the science.”
“Rep. Luna is focused on inflation, jobs and the economy,” Carson said. “She is the only Republican in the House of Representatives with legislation on IVF.”
That bill, the Right to Try IVF Act of 2024, has been criticized by Democrats as too narrow to be effective. The legislation would disqualify states that ban in vitro fertilization from receiving a federal block grant for mothers and children.
No state has explicitly tried to prohibit such treatments. But a February ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court that said frozen embryos should be considered children upheld an abortion ban that had implications for access to IVF. Such measures would not be disqualifying under Luna’s legislation.
In a statement, Luna avoided stating a position on Florida’s six-week ban and focused instead on the November ballot initiative.
“The Supreme Court returned these decisions to the states where it belongs,” she said. “Our system of government works best when decisions are made at the local level, not in Washington, D.C. These decisions should be made by Florida residents.”
A spokesperson for Salazar did not respond to a request for comment about the Florida court rulings.
Nicole McCleskey, a Republican pollster, said the rulings meant the GOP lawmakers would have to address the issue at some point.
“Hopefully, they do so in some clear and compelling way,” she said. “It’s not something they can avoid.” But McCleskey added that she did not think the issue of abortion would be sufficient for Democrats to win back the House, or the White House.
It is “the only issue they’ve got,” she said. “I’m unconvinced at this point that it’s enough.”
Since arriving in Congress in 2023, Luna has aligned herself with the hard right on many issues, but her district is far from it: In Pinellas County, Nikki Haley won 18.5% of the presidential primary vote despite having already dropped out of the race against former President Donald Trump.
Salazar’s district lies completely within Miami-Dade County. In 2022, Salazar’s race was considered one of the most competitive in the state, but she defeated her Democratic opponent in a surprise double-digit blowout.
Lucia Báez-Geller, a Miami-Dade school board member challenging Salazar, said she expected the stringent abortion ban to change that this year.
“There will be no access to abortion in any way,” Báez-Geller said in an interview. “When the reality of that sets in, people are going to be fed up. Our freedoms are on the ballot this November, but voters are also coming out to vote for who is going to protect their freedom. She has not voted for freedom.”
This article originally appeared inThe New York Times. © 2024 The New York Times
